You know that he talked about the difficulty in choosing someone from within the existing public service. On the one hand, this person would naturally be more likely to get along with people who are colleagues and essentially peers at the same level, such as deputy ministers and so forth, and would therefore be reluctant to find wrongdoing. Secondly, in terms of the effect on his or her career by displeasing the Clerk of the Privy Council or other DMs, the person would be reluctant to find fault.
In view of his strong advice or his urging that the government or Parliament look outside the public service for the Integrity Commissioner, as he advised when he left office, and as he advised when the last Integrity Commissioner was chosen and his advice was ignored, and as he advises again, why do I not see that in your comments, or have I missed it?