Yes: no self-aggrandizement. It isn't really allowed.
There is a motion on the floor.
Just to be abundantly clear, it reads, Mike, as follows: the first questioner, NDP; the second, Conservative; the third, NDP; the fourth, Conservative; the fifth, Liberal; the sixth, Conservative; to be repeated until we run out of time.
That's fairly clean and clear.
(Motion agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Good. We have consensus. We're off to a great start.
The third item we have to clarify is with regard to witnesses belonging to the same organization. It's a challenge for the clerk sometimes to schedule witnesses when we have a study where the various parties submit all their wish lists for witnesses. It's up to the clerk to try to decide a reasonable balance in the limited time we have.
I presume this motion is about giving the chair and the clerk the latitude to cluster witnesses or...?