In AMITA, we all use BDC funding from time to time, and working capital becomes really important when you're trying to take a new initiative forward in the marketplace. Here we're talking about maybe a reallocation, allocating more directly. The SR&ED, I think, is indirect, in that the company first invests, and then gets a tax credit afterwards. Maybe the fine point here is that the company has to make the investment. With BDC, you're going out and looking for working capital for an idea. It's not as expensive as other types of capital, but it's still quite a bit of money for BDC.
Running a company, we are often self-financing quite a bit of the time. In AMITA, we do have to finance our growth most often. And when we get to the point where working capital for a new idea is required, then we're looking around to see where that can come from and what the options are. I think that may be part of what this report is saying: in those particular cases where you need that, then BDC is a good choice.