Well, it's always tough, and on this one I have to say that we haven't made our final decision on CICP either because we'd like to see what the outcomes are. And we are pleased that it's not a direct subsidy because that would have been more difficult for us. Rather it's just paying for the testing, which we think is a better approach.
But we are concerned, of course, always. It's always risky when governments get into this game of picking the winners and losers. From my understanding--and I'm not super knowledgeable on the program--it does seem that they tried to take it independently to NRC and have them go through the whole process for them. However, ultimately, somewhere down the road we get calls from a member who is just off the list, or their competitor got in and they didn't. This is the part where it can be a bit more troublesome as to who gets it and who doesn't. And governments...should they be in that game, is always a question.