That's the end of the first round of questioning.
I wanted to ask for some clarification on one point in the testimony from Mr. Yeh.
We heard testimony from previous witnesses earlier in this study who pointed out the United States office of small and medium-size enterprises, or the sister organization that assists SMEs, is almost a public interest override. Projects are not bundled into mega-contracts unless it can be demonstrated it's absolutely necessary. So the default is smaller bite-size contracts instead of massive overwhelming contracts.
Could I ask you to talk about what you called the risk transfer that's possible, going from the risk of it being in-house to the risk of being in one mega-contractor doing all that IT work for us?