There are two pieces to AECL, as I mentioned. The first piece relates to the ongoing operations of AECL. That's the voted bit. The second piece relates to the divestiture.
You're right, the sale has been concluded. That agreement actually included an acknowledgement by that new company that there were some projects under way that were started by AECL and that are over budget. The government has effectively agreed to hold the company harmless for those cost overruns, because we know those projects are behind schedule. So when you see the divestiture, the statutory piece, that's because we've agreed to include funding to effectively offset the losses because of those project delays.