The literature would suggest that it has been the experience in some other countries that the ratio of well-founded wrongdoings is very low. In the U.S., something like 2% of the cases that were reported were found to be well-founded. That's one explanation.
I work on a case-by-case basis. I don't care about percentages. We look at each and every case to determine whether it fits within the mandate. There are several cases that are rejected because they simply do not fit, and this doesn't apply to those cases.
We have to follow the law, essentially. Something has to be a wrongdoing as defined. Something has to be a reprisal as defined.