I don't see what the big issue is. All he's doing is moving that we hear some witnesses. What's the problem? It's another example of the “shut up” government, right? All we want to do is have the ability to hear out some very competent witnesses on this issue. So I don't see how this is an issue and why it can't go ahead now as a motion.
On December 13th, 2011. See this statement in context.