Okay, thank you.
Turning to the subject at hand, I was struck by your comment, Mr. Corbett, about the importance of one job in a small community. It brought me back to 2005 when we were doing an expenditure review. I remember a huge argument in caucus about whether one job would be located in Newfoundland, or some other part of Atlantic Canada.
From your description it sounds as if you're going from 308 to 20. It's virtually inevitable that the job losses will be disproportionately in small communities, unless perhaps they set up one or more of the 20 in small communities. That's my first question.
When we were doing this we had job losses just through attrition. Do you know if there's a possibility of that, or will there be straight firing of people?