No. I think the projects we have done in the private sector are single-threaded. They were not 43 departments or 43 companies merging at the same time, and the scale and scope were not as large as what you're seeing here. I would not dispute the PricewaterhouseCoopers study. What I'm saying is, transformation-wise, IBM should have been larger than HP, just given the sheer size of the organization.
It is a function of the organization and a function of the type of project you're undertaking. In smaller cases, what I have gone through is three to five years.