Now I'd like to move on to another topic. I'm coming back to the mandate.
You told us that you had a certain mandate initially and that, four months later, it had been changed. Then, at another point, you told us—and it's in the report—that there are some areas of activity that you did not study and that might be sources of savings for the Government of Canada.
Who decided that the networks could be considered, but not the consolidation of mainframes? Why keep the networks, but not the data storage? I think we're missing some logic here. As long as we're doing something, why not look at everything, thoroughly, in the context of this study?