Excellent. Thank you very much.
My colleague Alexandre Boulerice just asked what part of the potential savings of $45 million, in a cautious scenario, represents staffing cuts. One of the tables in your report indicates that, if we aggregate the transformation phase with the transition phase, we could save up to $46 million in human resources. Given that there are gains in some areas and losses in others, can we safely say that, in a cautious scenario, 100% of the savings would relate to staffing cuts?