My second question is about another long-term project. It deals with expectations vis-à-vis the Kyoto Protocol.
In October 2011, the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development apparently produced a report on government expenses totalling $9.2 billion. An amount of $2.3 billion was discovered to have nothing at all to do with reducing greenhouse gases. I am beginning to wonder about the relevance and even the structuring of the budgets. Why include items in budgets that have absolutely no business being there? Why do we find expenses that are impossible to attribute to a budget year? Seven departments are involved with the Kyoto Protocol and we have no way of knowing how much each of them spends on that specific item each year. I have tried to find the figures, but I have not been able to. That is why I would like to hear your comments.