I would suggest you've already got it. If you look at them by reporting agency, the department performance reports list the architecture and the strategic outcomes, and it's very good. It falls apart when the costing information doesn't continue consistently with that approach; it is listed in the estimates, and then you have to take a bit from here and a bit from there and speculate about what may or may not be in there.
The votes you're required to make in Parliament correspond to the way information is presented in the estimates. In terms of accounting, is it accurately reflected? Yes, it is, but in terms of your having to make a yes-no decision, it's very difficult to be in a position to make any kind of judgment on whether this is a good use of money. We're so far from that capability that it's no wonder $262 billion goes through the House in two hours. What else would you do?