I might be missing a point, but I would have thought that for a committee doing a study on improving information, these would be more or less motherhood recommendations that you were making. Why would we not want better information in the RPPs for the three previous years and the three future years, including information on employment? I can't see why anybody would object to that.
That was, I believe, your first recommendation, which makes a whole lot of sense to me. Do you think it would be difficult for the government to produce this additional information that you're recommending? Do you think it would require a whole lot more staff in government to do this, or would it be relatively simple? Perhaps you don't know.