Yes, I think that would have to be part of the effort.
This question is on a totally different issue. One form of accountability is in trouble when funds are appropriated for X and used for Y. Now we did have that issue with the G-8 legacy infrastructure fund, which was money taken out of the border infrastructure fund. We had similar issues with the green infrastructure fund. I gather such moves are not illegal, but do you know—and perhaps this is too technical—whether there's a way to end that, so that money allocated for X is spent for X, unless the government comes back to Parliament and requests a change?