They're incremental costs, firstly, so they don't include such things as depreciation or salaries. That is not normally part of what would be considered incremental costs when it comes to the mission. So the Rideau Institute, as so often is the case, is wrong.
Again, on the price per ordnance, they are putting a figure forward that is double what the Department of National Defence has paid for the types of munitions that we've been using in this mission--that is, guided ordnances, colloquially referred to as smart bombs. They have ordnances in place that are designed and put in place, as you would know, Mr. McCallum, to ensure precision. Laser-guided ordnances by their very nature are going to be more expensive, but they are nowhere near--