I think it would be worthwhile, as my colleague mentioned.
I had the same concerns about the roof and the expenditures. It's been clarified that it's going to be $45 million to $50 million for the roof. It's not $1 billion, which I originally mentioned. I have concerns about $850 million. I never saw the plan. It was approved, they said, by government. I'm not sure who it was within government, but that's the minister's responsibility, and I respect that.
I just think it would be very informative to take a first-hand look at the professional job being done there.
My question, being a fiscal conservative, is specifically about the increase in the main estimates of about $46 million for the federal contaminated sites. I think it's prudent to spend money when you're looking after our environment and brownfield remediation, etc. Could you maybe elaborate a little bit more on the remediation and assessment activities for which funds are being requested in the main estimates?