Okay.
Your office, as you've highlighted, gives us a little booklet when you join. Now, I've been here six years and have spent a lot of time looking at this stuff, but not everybody has. One of my recommendations is that we need to be better trained, as individuals, to understand what we're looking at.
With your accounting hat on, would you say that it's easier for those who are not in the financial area to understand cash over accrual? Is it not an easier concept to understand? Regardless of how long the asset's going to last and when the actual acquisition takes place, it's just easier to understand that we have to put away the cash for it, and we're spending it this year, even though it may have a longer lifetime and we may acquire it over time.
What's your view of being able to train MPs, who come from all different backgrounds, on accrual over cash? Or do you think it doesn't really matter?