No, you wouldn't look at 50, but if you looked at 10....The other thing, of course, is the randomness. As I say, if you change the motivator, you change the results. This is why I wanted the Auditor General to do these audits on departmental performance reports and to pick two at random every year.
If you're coming up next year and you're going to be reported to Parliament as having written some self-serving fluff—which is what I called them—then you're going to be on the hot seat before the public accounts committee and that's not a great place to be. So you put the effort into writing a good report.
It's the same with the management of the programs. If you think you're going to be sitting right here trying to explain to some parliamentary committee why your program is being poorly and badly managed, you're going to think you'd better do something before you get there. It a motivator. Change the motivators and you might get better results. It's great.