First, a unanimous committee report would be strong. A government initiative would be needed to implement the recommendations. The government's response to the last report was, to use an English expression
“mealy-mouthed”.
Winning conditions are characterized by a government that wants parliamentary participation in accountability to be active and to produce something for parliamentarians as well. Furthermore, it is once again a matter of individuals. The membership of a committee becomes important if you get to that part.
I have been following this file for 40 years. The first major change came about in 1970 because the government wanted it. The second change was made in 1987 because the government wanted it. The response will be the same as it was regarding the last two reports if the government is not willing. Therefore, you need to use winning conditions to ask for the government's support in order to make your role in the business of supply more relevant.