Thank you very much for the question.
I want to reassure the committee members, Mr. Chair, that we are talking about a timing and a budget process on both of these questions. I would not want first nations people listening to this committee to be concerned that in fact there had been a reduction in the programs as outlined. This is a timing question. Some figures get reflected in the main estimates and some get reflected in the supplementary estimates. As I said, there is no change in the program, no change in this current year in any of the programs that are being cited. Again, I would not want anyone listening or following these proceedings to take what is essentially a budget mechanism issue with government budgeting about timing to think in any way that the programs had been reduced, because that's simply not the case.
Again, the situation on the environmental risk, as mentioned, is the same situation where these estimates...when we compare them to main estimates last year, we were at the end of the sunsetting programs for environmental assessment. Those have been reviewed, as was announced in Budget 2011, and the government has committed $200 million for the renewal of those programs on a go-forward basis over a number of years. The majority of it comes to Health Canada, but we work in close partnership with Environment Canada and some other departments, so that money will be allocated. I can assure the committee that we will see that budget figure reflected in individual departmental supplementary estimates.