I wanted to come back to the issue that Mr. Wallace raised, as I am a little concerned.
When I look at the supplementary estimates and you take the three programs that are laid out, it appears to me that there's actually a reduction in the funding when you compare it to 2010-11 programs that were linked to first nations and Inuit people.
Can you confirm that the numbers in the estimates, even though they're in three different sectors, are actually a clear reduction in the funding allocated to first nations and Inuit people compared to the estimates in 2010-11?
I certainly understand that there may be supplementary estimates coming forward and that it is demand-driven. It's very clear to me, though, when you look at the estimates, that we are looking at a reduction.