I'm simply raising that because in the introductory remarks it was mentioned that one of the priorities for CIDA is to support the development of good governance. It seems logical to me that one of the criteria for continuing aid where there's been aid for 10, 20, or 30 years, for example, would be whether they are moving in a path of reducing corruption and improving good governance. Is that not right now one of the criteria for deciding who's in and who's out?
On April 30th, 2012. See this statement in context.