So what I take from your comments is that the public administration has the ability to provide that information in that way with the resources it has. Okay. In that case, it is quite clear.
Now I want to talk about the review being done by the various committees. One of the reasons we started this study was the difficulty we had trying to make sense of the estimates given the quantity of information involved. Every committee has to do an assessment, but since we can't figure out what we should be comparing, confusion sets in and the whole exercise becomes almost futile.
By the way, there have been other attempts to bring everything together in a more coherent way, both in 1998 and in 2003.
As far as the information provided to MPs goes, what changes do you think are needed to make everything easier to understand, so we can then identify the relevant information and do our job more effectively and efficiently?