Certainly, for us, it's a question of looking at the overall plan for our assets, and having a longer planning horizon would always allow us to do that better, so knowing the longevity of programs, knowing what plans are farther downstream, would allow us to take a stronger position with respect to our buildings. At the same time, we must acknowledge that our clients need to have agility in delivering government programs, so that's always the trade-off between our knowing whether we have a 10- or a 15-year use for a building, and therefore appropriate investments, versus clients who may say they've got a program that's going to run five years, and they need to get two years in before they know it's going to continue.
That's the trade-off: finding that right balance between program need to support government operations and the investments we need to make in our assets.