That's a good question. Thank you, Mr. Braid.
I'm not sure I have a clear view on that. Certainly if you do an in-house procurement and all the facets to go along with that—for instance, some highways departments have their own repair/maintenance facilities. Some municipalities are even considering acquiring equipment for their own construction. A lot of in-house jobs are going to be associated with that. Is that a good idea? It doesn't strike me as likely, because this is an area where the private sector demonstrates that it's very good at doing something and the public sector contracting agency doesn't have to take on the risks of acquiring equipment, doesn't have to build the processes, the payroll, and the constituency that goes with it when you do this in-house. So whether there are more or fewer jobs, I'm relatively unconcerned. The idea is that the jobs should be done by the party best able to do them and best able to manage the risks.