I just wanted to add that while the role of the council is to promote greater uptake of public-private partnerships and innovative approaches to infrastructure development and service delivery through public-private partnerships with all levels of government, the reality is that P3s are not the be-all and end-all. It's not the right approach in every instance. It is certainly a very valuable tool, an arrow in the quiver, if you like, of approaches to infrastructure development.
Value for money is a key factor in deciding whether you go down the P3 road or have traditional procurement. What I would add, too, is that if we could bring the same discipline and oversight to traditionally procured projects as is brought to P3s, I think you would find that those traditionally procured projects would also be far better delivered and with far better outcomes.