I have just one final point. I think in the case of smaller projects there's also the opportunity to bundle them together, where it makes sense, so that in fact you do have a large enough overall project and a critical mass to enable you to go ahead with a traditional approach to P3s. I would add, and you may have seen this in the case of the U.K., that in fact it has had a number of very successful smaller P3s, smaller than the $50 million or $100 million we're talking about here. There is an opportunity here for us to explore how the U.K. has approached this in order to see whether there are lessons learned that we could bring back to our municipalities across Canada.
I think over time we're going to see a larger number of smaller projects looking to this approach, as to whether it's viable or not. I think that may also prompt a little bit of a recalibration of the traditional approach to P3s in Canada to enable that to happen.