Thank you.
With regard to the transparency of the Alberta model, a great deal of effort was put into transparency through fairness auditors, so the transparency on the first round was exceptional. The documentation is readily available on websites. One of the key aspects of the program was in fact the transparency as to what's happening when and where.
With respect to being better, the projects we have built in Alberta, in my opinion, after looking at both methods of delivery, are “as good as”. I think that's a good statement. I'm not prepared to say they are better, but that wasn't the goal; the goal was to have quality schools. The delivery was faster in that using standard designs and bulking up the project made things move more quickly. It did have a larger project component, and since the project was large, it had momentum. Also, it was a large project both in Edmonton and in Calgary, which made it possible to get some of the impediments out of the way. People were more committed to the project because of the size.