Thank you very much.
You make a good point. A number of other witnesses have appeared before us and have said that, in some cases, P3s might make sense. In other cases, design-build might make more sense. The problem right now is that the emphasis seems to be on moneys being available only for P3s. If similar efforts were made in better managing government-delivered projects, in the same way that there's been all this investment in a new P3 office to support departments to better manage their P3s...? Do you think if similar changes were made in the way other projects were managed, we might see similarly good results?