Absolutely, I think it is a very important area.
The contrast between design-build or design-bid-build procurement versus P3s, is that our money, our guarantees, are at risk for the long-term performance of the infrastructure we're building. We're not guaranteeing this for a two-year warranty period following construction; we're on the hook here for 30 years. If there's a failing, our equity and the money we borrowed from the banks, that's all at risk.
We thoroughly analyze at the front end what it's going to cost us to maintain buildings or to maintain roads and bridges. In competition with some of the most competent private sector partners in the world in that competition, we refine that judgment about the responsibilities we're taking on, and there is no escape from those responsibilities.
We're acutely aware that if there's a major problem, for example, if I have to replace a chiller in Kelowna General Hospital, that's my money. I'm extremely motivated when I'm designing those facilities to make sure that those chillers are going to be long-life assets. I'm going to plan for their renewal when it's necessary. I'm going to have top maintenance staff making sure that they're kept in good condition. We plan for all those eventualities because it's our money that's at risk.