Thank you very much.
The idea in recommendation 2 is the notion that right now, although parliamentarians do receive information around program activity alignment, the question is how best to vote information. We're committing to providing an alternative format, using four departments as examples, to show the committee members what a new model might look like before going down that road. To change the vote structure would represent significant effort.
This is about presenting an alternative model using real information from last year's estimates to give committee members a sense of what the new model would look like before we proceed down a road where we would potentially invest significant time and effort to change the system. It's about having that discussion before we proceed.