Thank you for your answer, Mr. Légaré. I am pleased to know that your institution is considering other options. That is refreshing, as regards the relationship with NPOs.
My next question is in that area. Last time, we heard testimony about a highway in British Columbia. Previously, under conventional contracts, there were 100 inspectors, and now there are roughly 10 with P3s, but they at least do ad hoc checks. That is reassuring.
A little earlier, we talked about an NPO that played a specific role in management because there was less risk-related involvement. The project was also much smaller. So that was feasible. Millions of dollars are involved in conventional P3s. One of the current problems lies in citizens' perceptions, and they are important for us. In reality, transparency is important. Would there be a way of adding a partnership with cooperatives or NPOs that would have the role of checking, monitoring and consulting, that would have a much more active role? That would open the door to citizens being present when P3s are deployed over a number of years.
My question is for you, Mr. Légaré, but also for all the witnesses here today.