I haven't been called that since many years ago.Thank you to the witnesses for being here.
In the course of our examination of this subject, I think one of the biggest issues is a certain opaqueness in the studies on value for money and the lack of public information. We've been told that summaries of this analysis are available, but they don't really get into the meat of it. One witness told us that in Ontario they'd automatically have a 49% risk premium, and there's no justification or explanation for why that is the appropriate number.
My first question is for Mr. Légaré or Ms. Mullen.
What is being done in Quebec? Is there a risk premium, as is the case in Ontario? If so, is there a public analysis justifying that kind of figure?