I'll go quickly, because I think Mr. Légaré will have a much more extended answer.
It's growing, but I want to echo everyone else: it doesn't solve everything. P3s are good for maybe 15% to 20% of procurement, which means that about 80% or more is not appropriate for a P3. That takes a lot of procurement off the table. It's only a small part—maybe a fifth. That's the first point.
Secondly, it's more and more urgent because of declining economic growth and the looming infrastructure deficit that I see, living in a large city, and it troubles me a great deal. At the same time, of course, we don't want governments to become much more deeply indebted.
Third, because it is very complex, it does require a lot of transaction costs or due diligence up front, so smaller organizations probably don't have the expertise. That's why I see the importance of this new institution at the federal level in developing to become a repository, almost a government think tank, if you will, on P3 best practices, so they can advise and consult with agencies across the country.
In terms of the bundling, I'll defer to Mr. Légaré.