That's a really difficult question. In the private sector, because of its competitive nature, you do get benchmarking services, and they are so focused on costs that the ability to actually compare is very well developed. In government, it's not quite the same thing.
By way of example, the U.S. government and the Canadian government are closely aligned in terms of organizational structures and mandates and those sorts of things. One way you can look at this is to say.... Usually, a way of perhaps describing this is that the U.S. itself—its economy and the government itself—is roughly 10 times the size of the Canadian government, but we spend about $5 billion in total on IT, whereas the U.S. government spends north of $81 billion on IT. When you do the 10:1 ratio, it doesn't quite work. I'm not sure whether we are underspending or they are overspending, but those are the only kinds of benchmarks we have on that type of thing at this juncture.
Part of what we are going to do, as we develop our business plans for data centres and networks, is to try to get to a more private-sector-like comparative framework, because we do have enough scale and we do have enough ability to actually figure out how much it costs to run a server, how much it costs us per square foot to manage a data centre, or how much it costs us to actually deploy a network connection per person in a building.
Those will feature in how we actually do our work in trying to move the agenda forward, and we will try to strive for private sector performance in that sense. As I said, it's a complicated subject, but that's a way of trying to describe it.