There are a series of questions there. I'll start, then I'll turn to my colleagues to provide more information.
We do have an idea, as I mentioned, that we are on track, not ahead of schedule, in the reduction of positions. Now, there is attrition—that is, people in an aging workforce are leaving the public service. You have to take that into account as well as the impacts of these reviews.
As mentioned, and I won't get into repeating this in detail, we won't be able to get great precision on who is where until the process of the workforce adjustment has worked its way through the system.
That said, we have provided information on where the reductions will be, by portfolio, over the three years, and some estimate of those that are a direct result of the spending review.
I think we have provided a fair amount of information. We do track this closely. There will be changes along the way, and we will have to pick up those changes and report them.
I should also mention that we have not frozen hiring. There will always be a need for new hires in the public service, even while other people are leaving, because there are always shortages in certain areas.
Let me turn to my colleagues.