There were two cases mentioned, Mr. Chair. The first one, around the museum, is not actually new funding. What's happened with the Museum of Human Rights is that it's funded by a mix of various levels of government. There were some issues around timing of receipt of funds to actually make sure the museum could continue its construction.
What's happened here is that basically a federal contribution from a future year has been advanced to allow that museum's construction to continue on schedule. It's actually not any new, additional money for the museum in terms of what was originally committed, but there was a change in the profile. There was an urgent need on that part.
On the second one, the out-of-court settlement, sometimes when you have settlements there's a legal requirement to make a payment on a certain date. Because of the timing of estimates, the department couldn't wait for supplementary estimates (B) to actually comply with what had been agreed to.