Thank you.
I think there was perhaps a lack of clarity in my question the last time. When I was talking about cuts in program sub-activities, I meant to be referring to Treasury Board itself, and not to the whole of government.
I notice from your website that you do show expenditure reductions for five very broad frameworks or policy areas: management framework, people framework, expenditure management, financial management, and internal services. If one wants to do a meaningful analysis of where the expenditure reductions have come, this doesn't really get us anywhere, because it's so broad as to be virtually meaningless in terms of any kind of analysis.
My question to you is whether you can provide us with information at a more disaggregated level by sub-activity. Can you take each of those five areas and break them down into smaller chunks so that we can better understand what is going on?