I don't understand, because in order to come up with the number of $626,000 for management frameworks in year one, you must know the components that add up to $626,000. If you have that information, I don't know why you can't share it.
I'm not asking for 100 subcomponents for management frameworks—10, maybe—and you can do your own aggregation as to how best to do that.
For us as a committee studying estimates, to have information this broad is meaningless. I'm asking whether you can't give us, for example, something on the order of ten sub-policy areas for each of the five major ones or whatever is appropriate—not 100, but not zero.