I have two comments about that. First, that is the reason that the cuts made in order to deal with the structural deficit have been made to the administration only. The minister has been clear on a number of occasions: he did not want programs affected and he wanted to see more efficiency in the department. That is the fundamental reason.
Two things informed the way in which we made the cuts. The first was to make sure that there was no impact on the service provided to our stakeholders. I think they recognize that we have put a lot of effort into that. The second was the desire to treat the staff affected by the cuts well. I have figures with me that show we have done a very good job in that respect.