With respect to audits, our team was given two internal audit mandates. The first mandate was the one I spoke about in the presentation. The mandate was to audit our project management to see if there were things we could improve when it comes to following up on our own processes. We got the results a short while ago, and we will make sure we put it on the website. However, if the committee wishes, we can send you the terms of the contract, the contract and the results.
The second request has to do with the audit of payments. We haven't started that yet, but we will shortly. In the contract concluded with the manager responsible for construction, one clause indicates that PWGSC reserves the right to audit contracts, payments, and so on. We simply do due diligence, as set out in the contract. This firm will audit the accounts and verify whether we have paid as required. That's part of our internal management. We can submit the terms for this file as well, but we don't yet have the results because it will be starting shortly.
The new integrity framework is relatively new. Offhand, this framework does not cover companies that are already working. Companies that have already signed contracts do not come under this new framework because we must respect the contracts that people already have. I must tell you that the major contracts relating to work on Parliament Hill have been signed with companies like PCL. These companies are not currently accused of anything.