It would be BOMA BESt—I'm kidding.
The programs are quite different. LEED has a variety of different modules, and I use that word quite loosely. Their bread and butter has been in new construction. They have other areas as well, including existing buildings. Again, ours has been in existing buildings, and our approach has been that this is the world we live in, not the world we dream to be. How can we manage this building here, which is going through the system this month, in a manner that will generate optimal, or, at the very least, improved energy and environmental performance?
Our program has been designed in Canada by the Canadian industry. It is the only one of its kind in that regard, and we're significantly cheaper. There are consultants you can hire, but we don't have an army of consultants. I'm guessing that thousands of our buildings—a huge number—go through with the building managers doing the work. There certainly are some companies that you could hire, and that's an individual decision.
Perhaps I may have one more quick second. Mr. McCallum asked why the other 77% haven't gone through. It's a compelling case. I'd encourage the committee to use the 23% that are going through right now, that are beginning this month, as a test case. Decide for yourselves. We're confident that the program will pay for itself. Once you see the proof in the pudding down the road, then you can take your decision, or the government can take its decision on the remaining 77% or 70%, whatever it is.