Okay, thanks.
Ms. Buckley, I'd like to come back to the question of energy contracts that was raised earlier. If it's true that the cost of achieving efficiencies through those contracts is 20% to 40% higher than the cost if you have in-house operations, then it seems to me that it doesn't really make sense to do it that way, from the overall taxpayer's point of view.
From an individual department's point of view, if they don't have the capital, as you said, they don't really have any choice. But that's just one department. From a whole of government point of view, from the point of view of all Canadian taxpayers, would it not make sense to provide them with the capital and thereby achieve the 20% to 40% savings by doing it internally?