I would be happy to get back to you with the specific number. But off the top of my head, of the 79 whose jobs were affected, we had about 12 who decided to stay with the government and were able to get jobs elsewhere. When I say “jobs elsewhere”, it's meant after cuts. There were still jobs available with funding attached to them. So they weren't new jobs; it wasn't new money. There was a vacancy and they could be absorbed into the system.
There were also 20 other people who were able to alternate with people who wanted to leave the public service. I'll use Marc and me as an example. Marc has decided he is going to work in the private sector, but his job is not affected. My job is affected and I don't want to leave; I want to stay. So Marc and I say, let's switch. The manager has to approve that, but we switch. The person who wants to leave, leaves, and the person who wants to stay, who is suited for the job and for which there is money, stays. We had about 20 people who did that.