I want to ask you about this fairness monitor office that has been set up. I can't talk about the court ruling, and presumably we will have you back when the government finishes spending taxpayers' money to drag this case out. The court found a completely different finding than the fairness monitor.
I know you can't speak to the particular case of Envoy, but I'm wondering if, as a result of some of the findings in that litigation and by the Auditor General, you are giving second thought to the way the fairness monitor office is set up. Are you giving consideration to establishing something like a full-time procurement ombudsman for these larger procurements?