Could I give you a specific example of this? I may be way off base on this. A lot of my interest is in environmental protection and increasing our recurring liabilities, where you failed to attend to it. Let's say, for example, in northern Canada we have these contaminated sites that are on the books for year after year, and they're not being dealt with. Every year there's an announcement that okay, they're going to do two of the 500 sites, and so forth.
If you don't go to accrual in estimates—and I can understand there are lots of arguments for why you're saying it's simpler and so forth—do we have to wait for the performance report two years later to tell us how wise the decision was to spend only so much now on the cleanup, when we don't know what the higher liability might be if we delay the cleanup?
Is there not the danger to parliamentarians of not getting this additional information?