I don't want to belabour that, but it just occurred to me, having been in the middle of that in several orders of government.
One of the things that's troubling me is this. I think it was one of the many letters that were sent to us, and I think back from the Treasury Board to us. A strong argument against the shift from cash to accrual was that the shift would cost $600 million.
My question to you is several-fold. The previous Auditor General recommended shifting in that direction. One of the serious factors appeared to be...because then it would allow for a balancing of information on the resources, obligations or liabilities, and costs. Have you actually consulted with the Auditor General and given a rationale for why you're not going to do that shift? How are you actually addressing this issue of the outstanding liabilities?