You can't say who is holding our debt or how much is held by Canadian banks.
I want to start again with a fairly narrow question and then, if there is time, a more macro question. You're trying to package this change to short-term sick leave as sort of a net benefit to public servants, but surely there's a quid pro quo. I mean there's another side to this coin. They currently earn one and one-quarter sick days per month, which is not overly generous in my estimation. That will have to be reduced to show any savings. Is that the intent going into this round of bargaining, to reduce the number of sick days per month that employees earn and to therefore save?